How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
False: continuity of the right-hand side guarantees unique ODE solutions
Statement
False claim: Every continuous right-hand side gives a unique local solution through each initial value.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The false universal claim.
has distinct delayed-start solutions through the origin ( has a continuum of delayed-start solutions through the origin).
Refutation
Suppose the false claim were true; [L1] gives a continuous right-hand side with distinct solutions through the same initial value.
This contradicts the asserted uniqueness, so the claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Ch. 2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jiri Lebl, Basic Analysis I, Section 6.3 (standard reference, not scraped)