Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every connected finite graph is Dynkin

Statement

False: a connected finite graph need not be the Dynkin diagram of a crystallographic root system; positive definiteness and the edge restrictions exclude most connected graphs.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A cycle graph on m3 vertices and the conventions of the Dynkin diagram.

[L1]

The Dynkin diagram of a based root system has aijaji edges between vertices i,j and no others; a finite-type Cartan matrix is symmetrizable to a positive definite matrix. When the root system is irreducible, equivalently when its diagram is connected, that diagram is a tree (Dynkin diagram with edge multiplicity and arrow convention, Properties of finite-type Cartan matrices, Shape restrictions on Dynkin diagrams).

Proof

technique · counterexample
1.1

Let m3 and let G be the cycle graph on m vertices. A root system whose Dynkin diagram were G would have Cartan matrix A=2IAdj(G), since every edge corresponds to the single relation aij=aji=1 and nonedges to 0; this matrix is symmetric.

L1algebra
1.2

The nonzero vector x=(1,,1) satisfies xTAx=i2xi2+2i<jaijxixj=2m2m=0, because each vertex has exactly two neighbours in a cycle; hence A is not positive definite.

givenalgebra
2.1

Since a finite-type Cartan matrix must be symmetrizable to a positive definite matrix by [L1], no root system has the cycle G as its Dynkin diagram, although G is connected and finite. This refutes the claim that every connected finite graph is a Dynkin diagram.

L1step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources