How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every connected finite graph is Dynkin
Statement
False: a connected finite graph need not be the Dynkin diagram of a crystallographic root system; positive definiteness and the edge restrictions exclude most connected graphs.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A cycle graph on vertices and the conventions of the Dynkin diagram.
The Dynkin diagram of a based root system has edges between vertices and no others; a finite-type Cartan matrix is symmetrizable to a positive definite matrix. When the root system is irreducible, equivalently when its diagram is connected, that diagram is a tree (Dynkin diagram with edge multiplicity and arrow convention, Properties of finite-type Cartan matrices, Shape restrictions on Dynkin diagrams).
Proof
Let and let be the cycle graph on vertices. A root system whose Dynkin diagram were would have Cartan matrix , since every edge corresponds to the single relation and nonedges to ; this matrix is symmetric.
The nonzero vector satisfies , because each vertex has exactly two neighbours in a cycle; hence is not positive definite.
Since a finite-type Cartan matrix must be symmetrizable to a positive definite matrix by [L1], no root system has the cycle as its Dynkin diagram, although is connected and finite. This refutes the claim that every connected finite graph is a Dynkin diagram.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed., Chapter II (standard reference, not scraped)