How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every domain in C^2 is a domain of holomorphy
Statement
False claim: every domain in is a domain of holomorphy.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Real numbers and the Hartogs figure domain .
A domain that contains a Hartogs figure but not its hull is not a domain of holomorphy (A domain containing a Hartogs figure but not its hull is not a domain of holomorphy).
Refutation
The domain contains the Hartogs figure itself, while its hull is the full bidisc , which strictly contains .
Therefore [L1] applies directly and shows that is not a domain of holomorphy, refuting the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)