How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: separate holomorphy can fail to imply local boundedness
Statement
False claim: a separately holomorphic function on a finite-dimensional polydisc need not be locally bounded.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A separately holomorphic function on a polydisc.
Separate holomorphy forces boundedness on every smaller closed polydisc (Separate holomorphy forces local boundedness on smaller polydiscs).
Refutation
Let be separately holomorphic on a polydisc.
The conclusion of [L1] applies directly to , so is locally bounded. This contradicts the displayed claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Paul Garrett, Hartogs' Theorem: separate analyticity implies joint (standard reference, not scraped)