How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every nondecreasing function defines a Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure on Borel sets
Statement
False claim. Every nondecreasing function defines a Borel measure satisfying . The valid construction on this page also requires the right-continuity recorded in This page uses the nondecreasing, right-continuous, -interval convention.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The function
Measures are continuous from above on decreasing measurable sets when one set in the chain has finite measure. (Continuity from above when one set has finite measure)
Refutation
The function is nondecreasing but not right-continuous at : one has while for every .
If a Borel measure satisfied for every , then
for every . [given]
The sets decrease to , and .
Therefore [L1] would force
contradicting step 1.1. So no such measure exists. [step 1.1, L1] ∎
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Section 1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)