How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
This page uses the nondecreasing, right-continuous, -interval convention
This page fixes the convention
for a nondecreasing, right-continuous function . That pairing of monotonicity, interval shape, and continuity direction is the one used in Folland and Hunter, and it is the one for which the shrinking intervals force right continuity through continuity from above.
Another standard convention in the literature uses the left-continuous data instead. The two choices are both legitimate, but they are not the same construction for a fixed function. This page adopts the former convention once, records the latter here only as a warning, and thereafter uses the left-limit notation of The left and right limits of at , as limits of the restrictions of to and only in derived interval formulas. Throughout this page, the order hypothesis on is the weak one for .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Section 1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Section 2.9 (standard reference, not scraped)