How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every profinite group is pro-p for some prime
Statement
Every profinite group is pro- for some prime .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The profinite completion .
A pro- group is an inverse limit of finite -groups (A pro-p group is a profinite group that is an inverse limit of finite p-groups).
Refutation
The profinite group has nontrivial continuous quotients for every prime by [L1].
If were pro- for some fixed prime , then every finite quotient of would be a -group by [F1]. For each prime , the projection to the -adic factor followed by reduction modulo gives a quotient which is a nontrivial -group. This contradiction shows that not every profinite group is pro-.
Therefore the statement is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jordan Bell, The profinite completion of the integers, the p-adic integers, and Prufer p-groups (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian Osserman, Inverse limits and profinite groups (standard reference, not scraped)