How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every proper embedding of an n-manifold lands in R^n
Statement
False claim: every smooth -manifold admits a proper embedding into .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The circle .
Every smooth manifold does embed properly in (The weak Whitney proper embedding theorem).
Refutation
Suppose embedded in . Because is compact and connected, its image would be a compact connected subset of , hence a closed interval .
Removing any point from leaves a connected space, but removing an interior point from disconnects it, while removing an endpoint leaves a noncompact interval. Therefore is not homeomorphic to any closed interval. This contradicts step 1.1.
So the claim already fails in dimension . The honest general statement is the higher-dimensional existence theorem [L1], not an ambient-dimension-equality theorem.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Theorem 6.15 (standard reference, not scraped)