How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every total computable function is primitive recursive
Statement
False claim: every total computable function on a finite power of is primitive recursive.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The false claim above.
Every total computable function on a finite power of is primitive recursive.
The Ackermann function is total computable but not primitive recursive, by The Ackermann function is total computable but not primitive recursive.
Refutation
By [L1], the Ackermann function is a total computable function on , so it is directly an instance of the universal claim [A1].
The same fact [L1] states that is not primitive recursive. This contradicts [A1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jeremy Avigad and Richard Zach, Recursive Functions (standard reference, not scraped)