How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dimensions add under unions
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. The assertion for all subsets of a metric space is false, even for disjoint compact subsets of the line.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects, conventions, and hypotheses in the statement above.
Under the standing Countable Choice hypothesis, the dimension of a countable union is the supremum of the component dimensions. Hausdorff dimension is monotone and countably stable
Under the standing Countable Choice hypothesis, a positive-length subset of the line has dimension one. Euclidean space and positive-volume sets have their Euclidean dimension
Refutation
Let and . They are disjoint compact intervals, each with positive length, so .
Countable stability applied to these two sets and empty remaining terms gives . This differs from , refuting the asserted sum rule.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bishop–Peres §1.1 p.3 countable stability; Proposition 1.2.6 (standard reference, not scraped)