How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Induction followed by restriction is the identity on complex representations
Statement
False claim: for every subgroup , the composite is the identity on complex representations of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The subgroup and the nontrivial linear character of .
Inducing to gives the irreducible degree-two character (Inducing a nontrivial character of a three-cycle subgroup of gives an irreducible degree-two character).
Restricting that degree-two character back to gives (Restricting that degree-two character to the three-cycle subgroup gives the two nontrivial linear characters).
Refutation
By [F1], .
Applying restriction and then [F2] gives .
So induction followed by restriction is not the identity in general.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Section 4.11 (standard reference, not scraped)