How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An induced irreducible complex character is always irreducible
Statement
False claim: if is an irreducible complex character of a subgroup , then is irreducible.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The subgroup and its trivial character .
The induced character equals , where is irreducible of degree (Inducing the trivial character of a subgroup of order two in gives plus an irreducible degree-two character).
Refutation
The trivial character of the order-two subgroup is irreducible because every one-dimensional character is irreducible.
But [F1] shows that its induction to is , a nontrivial sum of two characters. So the induced character is reducible.
This single witness refutes the claim that induced irreducible characters are always irreducible.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Section 4.11 (standard reference, not scraped)