How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: successor-closure alone forces a set to be all of
Statement
False statement. If a set is nonempty and closed under the successor (), then . (That is, the induction principle would hold without its base case .)
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the claim above.
The induction principle requires (The principle of mathematical induction).
for all (P1) (The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system).
Refutation
Take , the set of nonzero naturals; it is nonempty (for instance ).
is closed under : for any , by P1 [L2], so .
But , so ; the nonempty successor-closed set is not all of , refuting the claim.
The base case is therefore indispensable in the induction principle [L1]; successor-closure and nonemptiness do not suffice.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mathematical induction (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peano axioms (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Aitken, MATH 378 Ch. 1: The Peano Axioms (CSU San Marcos) (standard reference, not scraped)