Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-02 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: successor-closure alone forces a set to be all of N\mathbb{N}

Statement

False statement. If a set SNS \subseteq \mathbb{N} is nonempty and closed under the successor (nSσ(n)Sn \in S \Rightarrow \sigma(n) \in S), then S=NS = \mathbb{N}. (That is, the induction principle would hold without its base case 0S0 \in S.)

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the claim above.

[L1]

The induction principle requires 0S0 \in S (The principle of mathematical induction).

[L2]

σ(n)0\sigma(n) \neq 0 for all nn (P1) (The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Take S=N{0}={nN:n0}S = \mathbb{N} \setminus \{0\} = \{n \in \mathbb{N} : n \neq 0\}, the set of nonzero naturals; it is nonempty (for instance 1=σ(0)S1 = \sigma(0) \in S).

given
1.2

SS is closed under σ\sigma: for any nn, σ(n)0\sigma(n) \neq 0 by P1 [L2], so σ(n)S\sigma(n) \in S.

L2
2.1

But 0S0 \notin S, so SNS \neq \mathbb{N}; the nonempty successor-closed set SS is not all of N\mathbb{N}, refuting the claim.

step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

The base case 0S0 \in S is therefore indispensable in the induction principle [L1]; successor-closure and nonemptiness do not suffice.

step 2.1L1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 16 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources