Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: the isomorphism between two splitting fields that fixes the base field is unique

Statement

False statement. If E and E′ are splitting fields of the same polynomial over F, there is exactly one isomorphism E→E′ that fixes F pointwise.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The splitting field E=Q(2) of x2−2 over Q.

[F1]

Any two splitting fields of the same nonzero polynomial are isomorphic over the base field (Any two splitting fields of a polynomial are isomorphic over the base field).

[F2]

The splitting field of x2−2 over Q is E=Q(2), with roots 2 and −2 (The splitting field of x2−2 over Q is Q(2), with roots ±2).

[F3]

An isomorphism of base fields extends across simple adjunctions when a chosen root is sent to a corresponding root of the transported irreducible polynomial (A base-field isomorphism extends across simple adjunctions of corresponding roots of an irreducible polynomial).

[F4]

Eisenstein's criterion proves a primitive integer polynomial irreducible under its prime-divisibility hypotheses (Eisenstein criterion over the integers).

Refutation

technique · counterexample
1.1

Take both splitting fields to be E=E′=Q(2) for x2−2. The identity map is one Q-isomorphism E→E.

F2
1.2

The polynomial x2−2 satisfies [F4] with the prime 2, so it is irreducible. Apply [F3] to the identity on Q and the corresponding roots 2 and −2. It gives a Q-automorphism τ:E→E satisfying τ(2)=−2.

F2F3F4
2.1

The roots are distinct: if 2=−2, then 22=0, and multiplication by 1/2 would give 2=0, contradicting (2)2=2. Hence τ is not the identity. Thus there are at least two base-fixing isomorphisms, refuting uniqueness while leaving the existence result [F1] intact.

F1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources