Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nilpotent acting basis suffices for Engel's theorem

Statement

In Engel's theorem it is enough to check that the adjoint operators belonging to the members of one vector-space basis are nilpotent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A characteristic-zero field k and g=sl2(k) with its standard basis e,f,h satisfying [h,e]=2e, [h,f]=−2f, and [e,f]=h.

[L1]

Engel's theorem requires ad⁡x to be nilpotent for every x∈g, not merely for chosen basis elements (Engel's theorem).

[L2]

A representation is nil only when every represented operator is nilpotent (Nilpotent transformations and nil representations).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Put u=h+e−f. The three vectors e,f,u form a basis: comparison of the h-coefficient in ae+bf+cu=0 first gives c=0, and then a=b=0. Directly, ad⁡e(e)=0, ad⁡e(f)=h, and ad⁡e(h)=−2e, so ad⁡e3=0; similarly ad⁡f(e)=−h, ad⁡f(f)=0, and ad⁡f(h)=2f, so ad⁡f3=0.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

The remaining brackets are [u,e]=2e+h, [u,f]=h−2f, and [u,h]=−2e−2f. Applying ad⁡u once more sends these three values respectively to 2u,−2u,−4u, and [u,u]=0; hence ad⁡u3=0. Thus every member of the chosen basis e,f,u acts nilpotently.

3.1L1L2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Yet h=u−e+f belongs to their span and ad⁡h(e)=2e, so (ad⁡h)r(e)=2re≠0 for every r≥1 in characteristic zero. Therefore ad⁡h is not nilpotent, the adjoint representation is not nil in the sense of [L2], and g is not nilpotent by [L1]. This basis is the required counterexample; all calculations are finite and choice-free.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources