How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: Jensen's inequality holds on an infinite measure space without normalization
Statement
For every convex and every nonnegative measurable one has even when .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The statement above.
Jensen's inequality is stated for probability measures, so the normalization is part of the theorem (Jensen's integral inequality for a probability measure).
Counting measure is a measure on (Counting measure on an arbitrary set, Counting measure is a measure).
Refutation
On , let and[L2, given, construct] . Then
Therefore [step 1.1, L1, algebra] ∎ so the displayed inequality fails on this infinite measure space. This is why [L1] requires probability normalization.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard L. Wheeden and Antoni Zygmund, Measure and Integral, Theorem (7.44) (standard reference, not scraped)