How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the Lebesgue integral extends linearly to all measurable functions
Statement
Whenever measurable real-valued functions , , and all have defined extended Lebesgue integrals, the extended-real sum is defined and equals .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The statement above.
The actual linearity theorem only applies on (The Lebesgue integral is linear on ).
Refutation
On with Lebesgue measure, let ; its nonnegative Lebesgue integral is .
The integrals of , , and are individually defined, with [step 1.1, L1, algebra] values , , and . But is undefined, so the claimed unrestricted linearity identity fails. This is why [L1] restricts linearity to .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., §2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)