How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: recognizable means total halting
Statement
Whenever a machine recognizes a language, it halts on every input.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The language .
By Decidable and recognizable languages, a recognizer only has to halt and accept on the members of its language.
Refutation
Let be the machine that accepts immediately on input 0 and otherwise moves right forever without entering any halting state. Then accepts exactly the one-word language .
On every nonmember of , the machine from step 1.1 diverges. So recognizes but does not halt on every input.
Therefore recognizability does not force total halting, and the statement is false.
Depends on
Used by
- A recognizer for 0 that loops on every nonmember Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Watrous, Introduction to the Theory of Computing, Lecture 18: Further discussion of computability (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jean Gallier and Jocelyn Quaintance, Introduction to the Theory of Computation: Some Notes for CIS511 (standard reference, not scraped)