How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: zeta is given by the same Dirichlet series for every complex other than
Statement
False claim: zeta is given by the Dirichlet series for every complex .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two concrete failures of that claim.
At , the eta series represents the continued zeta value while the Dirichlet series diverges (The eta series can represent the continued zeta function where the defining Dirichlet series diverges).
At , the defining Dirichlet series is the divergent harmonic series (The defining Dirichlet series for zeta diverges at because it becomes the harmonic series).
Refutation
By [L1], the claim already fails at : the continuation exists there, but the Dirichlet series does not converge.
By [L2], the excluded point is also a divergence point for the defining series. Therefore the slogan "the same Dirichlet series works for every " is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Elias M. Stein and Rami Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 6 §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)