How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: is the ordinary sum
Statement
False claim: is the ordinary sum .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The special value at .
The special-values theorem gives (The Riemann zeta function has the standard Bernoulli special values at the positive even and nonpositive integers).
The continuation remark records that this value is not an ordinary series sum (The analytic continuation of zeta is not the same object as the defining Dirichlet series outside ).
Refutation
By [L1], the continued zeta value at is .
The ordinary partial sums of are , so they do not equal the fixed number . Step 1.1 and [L2] therefore refute the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Chandrasekharan, Lectures on the Riemann Zeta-Function, Lecture 11 §3 (standard reference, not scraped)