How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the Riemann zeta function is entire
Statement
False claim: the Riemann zeta function is entire.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The global continuation theorem for zeta.
Zeta is meromorphic on and has a simple pole at (The Riemann zeta function extends meromorphically to the complex plane with its only pole at ).
Refutation
By [L1], zeta has a pole at and therefore is not holomorphic there.
An entire function is holomorphic on all of , so step 1.1 rules that out. Hence zeta is not entire.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Elias M. Stein and Rami Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Theorem 2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)