How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the classical functional equation alone characterizes the Riemann zeta function
Statement
False claim: the classical functional equation by itself determines zeta.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The modified function
Zeta satisfies the classical functional equation (The Riemann zeta function satisfies the classical sine-gamma functional equation).
Refutation
The factor is entire, nonconstant, and invariant under because . Therefore multiplying the functional equation in [L1] by this factor shows that satisfies the same functional equation as zeta.
The function is not equal to zeta, since for example . Thus step 1.1 gives a different meromorphic function obeying the same functional equation, so that equation alone cannot characterize zeta.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Chandrasekharan, Lectures on the Riemann Zeta-Function, Lecture 12 §7 (standard reference, not scraped)