How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: Schur-Zassenhaus conjugacy needs no solvability or deeper input
Statement
The conjugacy part of Schur-Zassenhaus needs neither a solvability hypothesis nor any deeper finite-group input.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The local page boundary for Schur-Zassenhaus conjugacy.
This page proves complement conjugacy when the kernel or quotient is solvable (Schur-Zassenhaus conjugacy when the kernel or quotient is solvable).
The stronger clean theorem is recorded separately as a source-cited boundary item (The full Schur-Zassenhaus conjugacy theorem ‡).
Refutation
Fact [L1] shows that the local proof package carries an explicit solvability hypothesis.
Fact [L2] records that the full unrestricted conjugacy theorem sits beyond that local proof boundary. So the claim that no solvability qualification or deeper input is involved is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David A. Craven, Finite Group Theory (standard reference, not scraped)