How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The full Schur-Zassenhaus conjugacy theorem
Remark
The clean modern statement of Schur-Zassenhaus says: if is a normal Hall subgroup of a finite group, then complements to exist and any two of them are conjugate in .
This page proves that conjugacy statement only under the classical solvability hypothesis on the kernel or quotient. Craven's full formulation explains that the remaining solvability-free reduction uses deeper finite-group input, so the stronger statement is recorded here but not proved locally.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David A. Craven, Finite Group Theory (standard reference, not scraped)