How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Extensions with coprime kernel and quotient split
Statement
Let
be an extension of finite groups. If , then the extension splits.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed extension of finite groups, with .
In a group extension, the kernel is normal and the quotient recovers the base (In a group extension the kernel is normal and the quotient recovers the base).
A normal Hall subgroup has a complement (Schur-Zassenhaus existence theorem).
A complement to the kernel is equivalent to a splitting section (A group extension splits exactly when it has a complement or a compatible semidirect-product model, and a kernel retraction forces a direct product).
Proof
By [L1], the kernel is normal in and , so . Because , no prime divisor of divides . Hence is a Hall subgroup of .
By [L2], the normal Hall subgroup has a complement in . Then [L3] turns that complement into a splitting section, so the extension splits.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory (standard reference, not scraped)