How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
In a group extension the kernel is normal and the quotient recovers the base
Statement
Let
be a group extension. Then is a normal subgroup of , and the quotient is canonically isomorphic to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed short exact sequence of groups.
In a short exact sequence, the image of the first map equals the kernel of the second (Group extensions, sections, complements, and split extensions).
The kernel of a group homomorphism is a normal subgroup of its domain (The image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup and its kernel is a normal subgroup).
The first isomorphism theorem identifies the quotient by the kernel with the image (First isomorphism theorem for groups: ).
Proof
By [L1], . Since is normal in by [L2], the subgroup is normal in .
The map is surjective because the sequence is exact, so its image is . Applying [L3] to and using step 1.1 gives .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory (standard reference, not scraped)