How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the base group may collapse in an HNN extension
Statement
In an HNN extension, a nontrivial element of the base group can become trivial.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An HNN extension of a base group .
The canonical map from the base group into its HNN extension is injective. (The base group embeds in its HNN extension)
Refutation
If a nontrivial element of became trivial in the HNN extension, the canonical map would identify it with .
That contradicts the injectivity stated in [L1]. Hence the statement is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Roger C. Lyndon and Paul E. Schupp, Combinatorial Group Theory (standard reference, not scraped)