How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The base group embeds in its HNN extension
Statement
In an HNN extension, the canonical map from the base group to the presented group is injective. Equivalently, a base-group element represents the identity in the HNN extension only when it is already the identity in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An HNN extension of a base group .
If a Britton-reduced word represents the identity, then it has stable-letter length zero and trivial base coefficient. (Britton's lemma)
Proof
Regard as the HNN word of stable-letter length zero. It is Britton-reduced, since it contains no stable letters and hence no pin.
If this word represents the identity in the HNN extension, [L1] forces its unique base coefficient to be . Therefore distinct elements of remain distinct in the HNN extension, so the canonical map is injective.
Depends on
Used by
- FALSE: the base group may collapse in an HNN extension False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Roger C. Lyndon and Paul E. Schupp, Combinatorial Group Theory (standard reference, not scraped)