How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Britton's lemma
Statement
Let
be a Britton-reduced HNN word. If represents the identity, then and . Equivalently, every Britton-reduced HNN word containing a stable letter is nontrivial.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Britton-reduced word in the statement.
A Britton-reduced word has no pin, so a change of sign can occur only across a coefficient outside the subgroup that would create a pin. (HNN words, pins, and Britton-reduced words)
Relative to chosen transversals, every element has a unique transversal normal form, and the identity has the unique normal form of stable-letter length zero with trivial base coefficient. (Normal forms in an HNN extension are unique relative to chosen transversals)
Proof
Choose transversals containing the identity in both associated subgroups. Normalize by the procedure of [L2]. Because is Britton-reduced by [L1], no elementary pin reduction is available, so the normalization only replaces each interior coefficient by the corresponding transversal representative in the same coset and leaves the stable-letter length unchanged.
If , the resulting normal form is the identity's normal form from [L2]. Step 1.1 shows that this is possible only when , and then uniqueness in [L2] forces the remaining coefficient to be . The contrapositive is exactly the nontriviality clause for Britton-reduced words containing a stable letter.
Depends on
Used by
- The base group embeds in its HNN extension Corollary
- The stable letter has infinite order Corollary
- Britton reduction of a word with two pins Example
- FALSE: every word containing a stable letter is nontrivial False statement
- Every HNN conjugacy class contains a cyclically Britton-reduced representative Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Roger C. Lyndon and Paul E. Schupp, Combinatorial Group Theory (standard reference, not scraped)