How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Boone commutator extracts an auxiliary history
Statement
Assume AC. For a special word , if in , then there are freely reduced auxiliary words on with in the embedded rule group .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with .
is the -HNN extension centralizing ; is the -HNN extension centralizing , with all bases embedded. (Boone hnn tower and auxiliary subgroups)
A reduced HNN word with a stable letter is nonidentity; an identity word with stable letters therefore has a pinch. (Britton's lemma)
Assume AC for the HNN transversals. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
Set . It has one , hence is nonidentity by [F2]. In the identity word the only two letters must form a pinch. For the identity edge map of this says precisely , with membership in the embedded base .
Write where are auxiliary words and , and choose the least possible . Such finite expressions exist by and the definition of generated subgroup. If , the equality has exactly one and violates [F2]. Thus .
Apply [F2] to the displayed word for in . If a pinch uses its first , it pairs that with , so and in . Multiplying gives . This is the desired auxiliary equation.
Any other pinch pairs consecutive with and . Since commutes with , for either sign the corresponding subexpression satisfies Replacing it combines the neighboring auxiliary factors and gives an expression for with such occurrences, contrary to minimality. Thus this kind of pinch cannot occur.
A pinch exists, so step 3.1 must apply. Freely reducing and changes neither represented element nor alphabet, and yields the claimed . All coefficient equalities were obtained in , by the embedded-base clause in [F1]. Least finite length and finite free reduction need no additional choice.
Source locator
Rotman, printed pp.440–441, Lemma 12.13, including both signs of the later -pinch.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Joseph J. Rotman, An Introduction to the Theory of Groups, Chapter 12, pp.440–441, Lemma 12.13 (standard reference, not scraped)