How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Boone positive history pushing
Statement
Assume AC. If a special word satisfies in the positive semigroup, then in for words on . Consequently in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A positive special word and a finite symmetric semigroup history to .
The group relations are , , and , where , ; sharp preserves order. (Boone group presentation and special word)
embeds in ; centralizes , and centralizes and . (Boone hnn tower and auxiliary subgroups)
Assume AC as in the embedded tower. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
For every integer , follows by taking powers in . The rule relation also gives : from , obtain and multiply on the right by . Thus for either or , .
For a positive word of length , set . At , . If this holds for and , then Since , this proves the formula for all , for both signs.
Let be positive of length , let be its reversal and put . Then . Applying step 2.1 to and multiplying by gives Together with step 2.1 these are all four signed pushing identities, including and .
Every word in a history beginning at has exactly one positive state letter, since every relation preserves that count. Hence a contextual forward replacement has old word and new word with positive tape contexts . With , , the corresponding special spellings satisfy The reverse replacement uses and gives These equalities use only relations of .
Along the finite symmetric path choose, at each edge, the applicable equality expressing the earlier spelling as an auxiliary left factor times the later spelling times an auxiliary right factor. Substitution multiplies the left factors in path order and the right factors in reverse path order. Since the last spelling is , it yields . For a path of length zero both factors are empty. This is a finite product of explicitly given factors, with no choice of infinite histories.
Put . Since commutes with , . Since commutes with and , These equalities hold in by the embedded tower, under its stated AC assumption.
Source locator
Rotman, printed pp.432–433, Lemma 12.10 and sufficiency proof. The explicit exponent formula supplies the three identity verifications left implicit there.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Joseph J. Rotman, An Introduction to the Theory of Groups, Chapter 12, pp.432–433, Lemma 12.10 and sufficiency proof (standard reference, not scraped)