How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: the quotient is an integer only for small
Statement
False claim: the quotient
is an integer only for small values of .
Facts & Assumptions
Refutation
The first values of the quotient are at respectively, so the quotient keeps producing integers beyond the first few cases.
More generally, [L1] rewrites the quotient as for every natural number , and is a natural number by definition. So the quotient is an integer for every , not merely for small ones.
Remarks
- The point of the refutation is that the divisibility is proved by exhibiting a count. Once the quotient is , no separate arithmetic argument is needed.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- D. Guichard, An Introduction to Combinatorics and Graph Theory, §3.5 (standard reference, not scraped)