How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: if , then is a field
Statement
False claim. If is a nontrivial finite group and is a field, then is a field.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nontrivial finite group and a field .
The group algebra has nonzero zero divisors (Any nontrivial finite group algebra has zero divisors coming from a nonidentity cyclic subgroup).
In a field every nonzero element is invertible (Field).
Refutation
By [L1], choose nonzero elements with .
If were a field, then [L2] would make invertible, and multiplying by would give , contradicting step 1.1. So the claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Chapter 1 Section 1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)