How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every representation is faithful
Statement
False claim. Every representation of a group is faithful.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nontrivial group and its trivial representation over a field .
In the trivial representation, every group element acts as the identity map (The trivial representation, the regular representation, and permutation representations from finite -sets).
A representation is faithful when only the identity group element acts as the identity map (Intertwiners, the spaces and , equivalent representations, and faithful representations).
Refutation
By [L1], every element of the nontrivial group acts as the identity in the trivial representation.
Since some element of is not the identity, [L2] shows that this representation is not faithful. Therefore the stated claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Example 1.1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)