Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-05‡ rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

‡ Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are ‡ Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, ‡ Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and ‡ The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

FALSE: the horseshoe connecting map is independent without a comparison proof

Statement

False. Once the left derived connecting map has been written using a horseshoe resolution, its independence from the chosen horseshoe is automatic and needs no proof.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two choices of horseshoe resolution for the same short exact sequence.

[L1]

Item 9 defines the left derived connecting map from a chosen horseshoe resolution and comparison isomorphisms (The connecting map for left derived functors).

[L2]

Item 10 is the statement that different horseshoe choices give the same map (The left derived connecting map is independent of the horseshoe resolution and lifts).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Before [L2] is proved, item 9 produces one map from each chosen horseshoe resolution. Those maps are a priori attached to different auxiliary choices, so there is no equality available merely from the definition in [L1].

L1givenalgebra
2.1

The assertion of [L2] is exactly the missing comparison statement. Thus the independence is not automatic; it is a separate mathematical obligation that must be proved.

L2step 1.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources