How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: for every finite extension, the norm is just the product over the embeddings
Statement
False claim: for every finite field extension and every , the norm is just the product of the distinct -embeddings of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The purely inseparable extension and the element .
In a finite extension, the norm is the product over embeddings raised to the inseparable degree (Norm and trace from embeddings, with the inseparable exponent in the norm formula).
The extension is purely inseparable of degree and has only the inclusion embedding (For , the trace is identically zero).
Refutation
By [L2], the product over the distinct embeddings of is just itself.
But [L1] and [L2] give and in the rational function field. Therefore the displayed claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. Conrad, Norm and trace, Theorems 2.3 and 3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, v5.10, Remark 5.47 (standard reference, not scraped)