How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every quintic is insoluble by radicals
Statement
False claim: every quintic is insoluble by radicals.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quintic polynomial over .
The polynomial is solvable by radicals ( over is solvable by radicals although it is a quintic).
Refutation
The polynomial has degree five, so it is a quintic.
By [L1] it is solvable by radicals, so the statement that every quintic is insoluble by radicals is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, v5.10, Section 7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Ash, Basic Abstract Algebra, Section 6.8 (standard reference, not scraped)