How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
False statement: the sum of the irreducible degrees equals
Statement
False claim. For a finite group , the sum of the degrees of the irreducible representations equals .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group .
Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic prime to , the correct identity is the sum-of-squares formula (If is algebraically closed and , then ).
Refutation
From [L1], the irreducible complex representations of have degrees , , and . Their sum is .
But , so the unsquared sum is not the group order. Indeed [L2] gives the correct identity Therefore the claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Theorem 3.1(ii) (standard reference, not scraped)