How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If is algebraically closed and , then
Statement
Let be a finite group and let be an algebraically closed field with . If is a complete list of the irreducible representations of over , up to equivalence, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and an algebraically closed field with .
The regular representation decomposes as where are the irreducible representations of (If is algebraically closed and , there are finitely many irreducible representations, and each occurs in the regular representation with multiplicity equal to its degree).
For a finite group, (If is finite then ).
Proof
By [L1], the regular representation is a direct sum of copies of each , and [L2] says its total dimension is .
Taking dimensions in step 1.1 gives This is the required identity.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Corollary 2.1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Theorem 3.1(ii) (standard reference, not scraped)