How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If is algebraically closed and , there are finitely many irreducible representations, and each occurs in the regular representation with multiplicity equal to its degree
Statement
Let be a finite group and let be an algebraically closed field with . Then there are finitely many irreducible representations of over , up to equivalence, and the regular representation decomposes as
In particular, each irreducible representation occurs in the regular representation with multiplicity equal to its degree.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and an algebraically closed field with .
Under these hypotheses, there is a -algebra decomposition
for positive integers (If is algebraically closed and , then ).
For such a product ring with , the simple left modules are exactly the column modules , one isomorphism class for each factor (Simple modules over a product of matrix rings over division rings).
For , the left regular module is the direct sum of copies of its simple column module (Matrix rings over division rings are semisimple).
Under the dictionary, irreducible representations are exactly simple left -modules (Under the dictionary, subrepresentations are exactly submodules and irreducible representations are exactly simple modules).
The regular representation of over is the left action on (The trivial representation, the regular representation, and permutation representations from finite -sets).
Proof
By [L1], the left regular -module is isomorphic to the left regular module of . As a module over that product, the regular module splits as the direct sum of the factor regular modules, and [L3] decomposes factor into copies of the column module . Thus the regular representation [L5] is a direct sum of finitely many simple modules, with the factor- simple occurring exactly times.
By [L2], those factor column modules give all simple module isomorphism classes, one for each factor. Translating with [L4], there are finitely many irreducible representations of , one for each factor, and the factor- representation has degree because its underlying vector space is . Therefore the regular representation contains each irreducible representation with multiplicity equal to its degree.
Depends on
- If $k$ is algebraically closed and $\operatorname{char} k \nmid |G|$, then $k[G]\cong\prod_{i=1}^r M_{n_i}(k)$
- Simple modules over a product of matrix rings over division rings
- Matrix rings over division rings are semisimple
- Under the dictionary, subrepresentations are exactly submodules and irreducible representations are exactly simple modules
- The trivial representation, the regular representation, and permutation representations from finite $G$-sets
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Corollary 2.1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Theorem 3.1(ii) (standard reference, not scraped)