How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Plancherel weights sum to one
Statement
For every , Hence is a probability distribution on the finite set (Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities): the weights are nonnegative and sum to one. In particular is obtained in two independent ways.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: ; the finite set of partitions of and the weights , where is the number of standard -tableaux and (The Plancherel measure on the partitions of ).
If is a finite group and is algebraically closed with , then there are finitely many irreducible representations of over , up to equivalence, and (If is algebraically closed and , there are finitely many irreducible representations, and each occurs in the regular representation with multiplicity equal to its degree).
The character of is at the identity and elsewhere, so (The regular character is at and away from ).
For over , the irreducible representations up to equivalence are exactly the Specht modules , (Specht modules classify the complex irreducibles of , Complex Specht modules are irreducible), and (Standard polytabloids form a basis of a complex Specht module).
for every , by the Robinson-Schensted count (The sum of squares of the standard tableau numbers, The Robinson-Schensted correspondence).
A finite probability space is a finite set with weights satisfying (Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities).
Proof
Regular-representation count: is algebraically closed of characteristic , and , so does not divide , so [F1] applies to , : the regular representation is with representing the irreducible complex representations of up to equivalence. By [F3] this list is and , so . Taking dimensions, which are additive over direct sums and multiplicative over direct powers, and using [F2] gives .
Independent count: the same identity is proved independently from the Robinson-Schensted bijection by [F4], so the two computations of agree without either appealing to the other.
Normalization: dividing the identity of steps 1.1 and 1.2 by the positive integer (for both sides read and ) gives . Each is a quotient of a nonnegative integer by a positive integer, hence is , and is finite (The Plancherel measure on the partitions of ); therefore , viewed as a function on the finite set , satisfies both requirements of a finite probability space in [F5].
Conclusion: the displayed normalization, the nonnegativity of the weights and the finite nonempty outcome set are exactly the assertion that is a probability distribution on ; the two independent evaluations computing are steps 1.1 and 1.2. This holds for every , including the degenerate case with the single empty partition.
Depends on
- The Plancherel measure on the partitions of $n$
- If $k$ is algebraically closed and $\operatorname{char} k \nmid |G|$, there are finitely many irreducible representations, and each occurs in the regular representation with multiplicity equal to its degree
- The regular character is $|G|$ at $1$ and $0$ away from $1$
- Specht modules classify the complex irreducibles of $S_n$
- Complex Specht modules are irreducible
- Standard polytabloids form a basis of a complex Specht module
- The sum of squares of the standard tableau numbers
- The Robinson-Schensted correspondence
- Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities
Used by
- Joint convergence in distribution and the normalized cycle-character observables Definition
- The Plancherel measure on partitions of three Example
- Plancherel expectations of the shifted character observables Proposition
- Scaled Plancherel profile moments converge in probability Proposition
- Plancherel Young diagrams converge to the limit shape Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Vladimir Ivanov and Grigori Olshanski, Kerov's central limit theorem for the Plancherel measure on Young diagrams, arXiv:math/0304010; survey-paper version in Symmetric Functions 2001, NATO Science Series II 74 (2002), 93-151 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dan Romik, The Surprising Mathematics of Longest Increasing Subsequences, Cambridge University Press 2015; author-hosted manuscript of 20 August 2014 (363 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)