How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Specht modules classify the complex irreducibles of
Statement
For every , the modules form a complete irredundant list, up to isomorphism, of finite-dimensional irreducible complex -representations.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: . Let be the set of partitions of , the set of conjugacy classes of , and the set of isomorphism classes of finite-dimensional irreducible complex -representations.
A partition is a finite weakly decreasing list of positive integers with sum (Partitions, English diagrams, and conjugation).
is finite and (The Lehmer code gives again).
is a field containing the embedded copy (The complex numbers as , with the real embedding and imaginary unit , is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse ); this field embedding preserves and addition (Field homomorphism and embedding).
is an ordered field and, for every integer , its canonical natural is positive (The reals form a totally ordered field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).
A ring has characteristic zero exactly when no positive integer multiple of its identity is zero (The characteristic of a ring is the additive order of , with recording infinite order; holds exactly when ; and in an integral domain every nonzero element has the same additive order as ).
The natural-to-integer embedding preserves order, and zero divides no positive integer (The naturals embed in the integers, Invertibility of a positive natural scalar in a field).
is algebraically closed (The complex numbers are algebraically closed).
For a finite group and algebraically closed field with , the finite set of irreducible representation classes has cardinality equal to the finite set of conjugacy classes (If is algebraically closed and , the number of irreducible representations of equals the number of conjugacy classes).
Conjugacy classes of are in bijection with the tuples of nonnegative integers satisfying ; when the unique empty tuple indexes the identity class (The conjugacy classes of are indexed by the tuples with ).
Each is a nonzero irreducible complex representation of (Complex Specht modules are irreducible).
If for , then (Distinct complex Specht modules are inequivalent).
A representation is finite-dimensional as specified in A finite-dimensional representation over a field, and its degree, is irreducible when it is nonzero and has no proper nonzero subrepresentation (Subrepresentations, direct sums of representations, and irreducibility), and two representations are equivalent exactly when an invertible intertwiner exists (Intertwiners, the spaces and , equivalent representations, and faithful representations).
For finite sets, a bijection transports cardinality (The cardinality of a finite set).
If and is finite, then is finite and implies (A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if ).
A map is injective when equal outputs force equal inputs, is surjective when its image is the codomain, and is bijective when it is both injective and surjective (Injection, surjection, bijection).
For the only partition is the empty list (Partitions, English diagrams, and conjugation).
Cardinality is defined for finite sets, and a finite set has cardinality only as a natural number (The cardinality of a finite set).
For , the unique empty tuple indexes the identity class of (The conjugacy classes of are indexed by the tuples with ).
A finite set has cardinality zero exactly when it is empty (The cardinality of a finite set).
No Axiom of Choice is used.
Proof
For each , [F5] gives . The embedding in [F4] sends this canonical real scalar to ; if the latter were zero, injectivity would make the positive real scalar zero, a contradiction. Thus no positive integer multiple of is zero, and [F6] yields .
The identity permutation belongs to , so [F3] makes a nonempty finite group and [F20] gives . The natural-to-integer embedding in [F7] preserves positivity, so characteristic zero does not divide this order; [F8] supplies the algebraic-closure hypothesis. Applying [F9] shows that and are finite and .
For a tuple from [F10], form the finite list containing copies of for each . Its entries are positive, weakly decreasing and sum to , so [F1] makes it a partition. The inverse map sends a partition to the multiplicity of each part . For , [F17] and [F19] make both constructions the empty list/tuple. Thus the tuple set in [F10] is in bijection with , and [F10] then gives .
Define by . Fact [F11] makes this a well-defined map into , and [F12] makes it injective.
By [F14] and step 1.2, the bijection in step 1.3 transports finiteness and cardinality, so is finite and .
Let . The map is injective by step 1.4, and its corestriction to its image is surjective by the definition of ; [F16] therefore makes this corestriction a bijection. Hence by step 2.1. Since is finite by step 1.2, [F15] gives . Thus is surjective as well as injective.
The surjectivity in step 3.1 says every finite-dimensional irreducible complex -representation is isomorphic to some ; injectivity in step 1.4 says no two distinct partitions give isomorphic modules. These are exactly completeness and irredundancy, proving the statement.
Depends on
- Complex Specht modules are irreducible
- Distinct complex Specht modules are inequivalent
- If $k$ is algebraically closed and $\operatorname{char} k \nmid |G|$, the number of irreducible representations of $G$ equals the number of conjugacy classes
- The conjugacy classes of $S_n$ are indexed by the tuples $(c_1,\ldots,c_n)$ with $\sum k c_k=n$
- Partitions, English diagrams, and conjugation
- A finite-dimensional representation $\rho:G\to \operatorname{GL}(V)$ over a field, and its degree
- Subrepresentations, direct sums of representations, and irreducibility
- Intertwiners, the spaces $\operatorname{Hom}_G(V,W)$ and $\operatorname{End}_G(V)$, equivalent representations, and faithful representations
- The symmetric group $\operatorname{Sym}(X)$: the bijections of a set $X$ under composition
- $\operatorname{Sym}(X)$ is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever $X$ has at least three distinct elements
- The Lehmer code gives $|S_n|=n!$ again
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- A subset of a finite set is finite, with $\lvert B\rvert \le \lvert A\rvert$, and equality holds if and only if $B = A$
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- The complex numbers as $\mathbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$, with the real embedding and imaginary unit $i$
- $\mathbb C=\mathbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field, every element is uniquely $a+bi$, and every nonzero element has inverse $(a-bi)/(a^2+b^2)$
- Field homomorphism and embedding
- The complex numbers are algebraically closed
- The reals form a totally ordered field
- Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing
- The characteristic of a ring is the additive order of $1_R$, with $0$ recording infinite order; $n \cdot 1_R = 0$ holds exactly when $\operatorname{char}(R) \mid n$; and in an integral domain every nonzero element has the same additive order as $1_R$
- Invertibility of a positive natural scalar in a field
- The naturals embed in the integers
Used by
- All three Specht modules of S₃ Example
Dependency tree · two levels
118 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charlotte Chan, Representation Theory of Symmetric Groups, Corollary 4.5 and its proof, printed p. 16; its proof cites Theorem 4.4 and the first corollary of Lecture 2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Theorem 3.5 and Corollary 3.6 with proof, printed pp. 33-34 (standard reference, not scraped)