How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: The transfer-matrix identity requires a spectral-radius or convergence hypothesis
Statement
False claim. The identity used by the transfer-matrix method requires an analytic convergence or spectral-radius hypothesis.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A square matrix over an arbitrary commutative ring .
In , the coefficientwise geometric series is a two-sided inverse of (Formally, over every commutative coefficient ring).
For a finite weighted directed multigraph over a commutative ring with vertices and transfer matrix , the walk generating functions are the entries of , equal to cofactors of divided by its determinant (Transfer-matrix theorem: weighted-walk generating functions are cofactors of divided by ).
Refutation
Multiplying by , the constant coefficient is and each positive coefficient is ; the same calculation works on the other side. This is the identity in [L1].
Every coefficient uses only finitely many ring operations, and the constant matrix coefficient of is the invertible matrix . No topology, norm, absolute value, or limiting operation occurs.
In the transfer-matrix setting itself — a finite weighted digraph over with vertices and transfer matrix — [L2] reads the walk generating functions off this same formal inverse, again with no analytic hypothesis. So the transfer-matrix identity remains valid over every commutative coefficient ring regardless of spectral radius. This refutes the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 35 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. P. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, vol. 1, 2nd ed., Theorem 4.7.2 (standard reference, not scraped)