Alphabeta Math

Examples: Linear Recurrences and Rational Generating Functions

About this page
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 15 results · all verified · 9 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 6 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.
1 · Prerequisites
2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Items

Example

The Fibonacci generating function and Binet formula over ℚ(√5)

Example

The Lucas generating function and its two-root closed form

Example

The repeated pole (1-2x)⁻² produces the sequence (n+1)2ⁿ

Example

The Fibonacci companion matrix advances (Fₙ,Fₙ₊₁)

Example

Monomer–domino tilings of a board give the Fibonacci recurrence and transfer matrix

Example

Cyclic monomer–domino tilings are counted by Lucas numbers through a matrix trace

Example

Closed walks of length n in Kₚ are counted by (p-1)ⁿ+(p-1)(-1)ⁿ

Example

Binary words avoiding 11 are counted by Fₙ₊₂

Example

Binary words avoiding 101 have generating function (1+x²)/(1-2x+x²-x³)

Example

North–east–west walks without immediate horizontal reversal satisfy aₙ=2aₙ₋₁+aₙ₋₂

Counterexample

A recurrence over ℚ can require a proper splitting field for its exponential closed form

False statement

FALSE: The recurrence coefficients alone determine the sequence

False statement

FALSE: A split characteristic polynomial always gives a linear combination of pure exponentials

Counterexample

∑_n≥0n!xⁿ is a formal power series that is not rational over ℚ

False statement

FALSE: The transfer-matrix identity requires a spectral-radius or convergence hypothesis

Sources