How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A coefficient sequence is eventually linearly recurrent if and only if its formal generating function is rational
Statement
Let be a field, let be a sequence in , and let . Then satisfies an eventual constant-coefficient linear recurrence if and only if is a rational formal power series.
More precisely, let with and . The sequence satisfies the corresponding recurrence from index exactly when has no nonzero coefficient of degree at least . In particular, the recurrence starts at zero exactly when is zero or has degree below .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a sequence , and its formal generating function .
For fixed with and , multiplication by identifies sequences recurrent from zero with numerators of degree below (The initial-value, recurrence-sequence, numerator and fixed-denominator rational-series spaces all have dimension ).
If and , there are unique with and either or (Division algorithm for polynomials over a field).
Proof
Suppose first that satisfies an order- recurrence from index . For , coefficient extraction gives , so is a polynomial and is rational.
An eventual order-zero recurrence means that is eventually zero, so is a polynomial and is rational with denominator .
Conversely, suppose with . Rescale so that , and use [L2] to write with or ; then .
If , [L1] says that the coefficients of satisfy the order- recurrence from zero, while the polynomial changes only finitely many coefficients; hence the coefficients of satisfy that recurrence eventually. If , then is eventually zero and has eventual order zero.
The coefficient calculation in step 1.1 is reversible: for fixed positive-degree , the recurrence holds at exactly when . This gives the stated starting-index clause and completes both directions.
Depends on
Used by
- The least eventual recurrence order is the degree of the reduced denominator Corollary
- ∑_n≥0n!xⁿ is a formal power series that is not rational over ℚ Counterexample
- A recurrence over ℚ can require a proper splitting field for its exponential closed form Counterexample
- North–east–west walks without immediate horizontal reversal satisfy aₙ=2aₙ₋₁+aₙ₋₂ Example
- The Fibonacci generating function and Binet formula over ℚ(√5) Example
- The Lucas generating function and its two-root closed form Example
- Changing finitely many coefficients preserves rationality and eventual linear recurrence Proposition
- For a bi-infinite linear recurrence over K, the two half-series satisfy F_+(x)=-F_-(x⁻¹) in K(x) Proposition
- Over a named splitting field in characteristic zero, repeated characteristic roots give polynomial-times-exponential closed forms Theorem
- The Hadamard product of two rational formal power series over a field is rational Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 34 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. P. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, vol. 1, 2nd ed., Theorem 4.1.1 and Proposition 4.2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. E. Sagan, Combinatorics: The Art of Counting, Theorem 3.7.1 (standard reference, not scraped)