Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For a bi-infinite linear recurrence over K, the two half-series satisfy F+(x)=−F−(x−1) in K(x)

Statement

Let K be a field, let d≥1, and let f:Z→K satisfy

f(n+d)+c1f(n+d−1)+⋯+cdf(n)=0(n∈Z),

where cd≠0. Put

F+(x)=∑n≥0f(n)xn,F−(x)=∑n≥1f(−n)xn.

Both series are rational, and in the rational function field K(x),

F+(x)=−F−(x−1).

More precisely, write F+=P/Q with Q=1+c1x+⋯+cdxd, P=∑j<dβjxj, and P≠0. If

r=min⁡{n≥0:f(n)≠0},s=min⁡{n≥1:f(−n)≠0},

then r=min⁡{j≥0:βj≠0} and f(r)=βr, while s=d−deg⁡P and f(−s)=−cd−1βd−s. Finally,

F+(x)=±xr−sF+(x−1)

holds exactly when f(n)=∓f(−n+r−s) for every n∈Z. If P=0, the recurrence and cd≠0 force f=0, so the main identity holds and the minima are intentionally left undefined.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field K and a bi-infinite order-d recurrence with nonzero trailing coefficient.

[L1]

An eventual recurrence has a rational generating function, and a recurrence from zero with reciprocal denominator Q gives a numerator of degree below d (A coefficient sequence is eventually linearly recurrent if and only if its formal generating function is rational).

[L2]

The fraction field of K[x] is the rational function field K(x)={P/Q:P,Q∈K[x], Q≠0} (For a field F, F(t)=Frac⁡(F[t]) is its rational function field; in particular R(t)=Frac⁡(R[t])).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1

Applying [L1] to the positive half gives F+=P/Q with deg⁡P<d, and applying it to the reversed negative half gives rationality of F−.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

In the vector space of all formal sums ∑n∈Zanxn, multiplication by the polynomial Q is coefficientwise finite. The recurrence says Q∑n∈Zf(n)xn=0, so linearity gives Q(x)∑n≥1f(−n)x−n=−Q(x)F+(x)=−P(x).

2.2step 1.1algebra

The lowest nonzero coefficient of P/Q equals the lowest nonzero coefficient of P, because Q(0)=1; hence the positive minimum is r=min⁡{j:βj≠0} and f(r)=βr.

3.1step 2.1L2algebra

Substitute x−1 for x in step 2.1 and interpret both quotients in [L2]; this gives F+(x)=−F−(x−1) in K(x), not as an equality of formal power series.

4.1step 3.1algebra

Rewriting −P(x−1)/Q(x−1) as −cd−1xdP(x−1)/(1+cd−1cd−1x+⋯+cd−1xd) shows that its first nonzero term has degree s=d−deg⁡P and coefficient −cd−1βd−s, proving the negative-side clauses.

5.1step 3.1step 2.2step 4.1algebra

Apply the main identity to replace F+(x−1) by −F−(x); coefficient comparison then shows that F+(x)=±xr−sF+(x−1) is equivalent to f(n)=∓f(−n+r−s) for every integer n.

6.1step 1.1given∎

If P=0, then F+=0, so f(n)=0 for n≥0; solving the recurrence backwards using cd≠0 gives f(n)=0 for all n∈Z, and the main identity remains valid.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources