Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For a bi-infinite linear recurrence over K, the two half-series satisfy F+(x)=F(x1) in K(x)

Statement

Let K be a field, let d1, and let f:ZK satisfy

f(n+d)+c1f(n+d1)++cdf(n)=0(nZ),

where cd0. Put

F+(x)=n0f(n)xn,F(x)=n1f(n)xn.

Both series are rational, and in the rational function field K(x),

F+(x)=F(x1).

More precisely, write F+=P/Q with Q=1+c1x++cdxd, P=j<dβjxj, and P0. If

r=min{n0:f(n)0},s=min{n1:f(n)0},

then r=min{j0:βj0} and f(r)=βr, while s=ddegP and f(s)=cd1βds. Finally,

F+(x)=±xrsF+(x1)

holds exactly when f(n)=f(n+rs) for every nZ. If P=0, the recurrence and cd0 force f=0, so the main identity holds and the minima are intentionally left undefined.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field K and a bi-infinite order-d recurrence with nonzero trailing coefficient.

[L1]

An eventual recurrence has a rational generating function, and a recurrence from zero with reciprocal denominator Q gives a numerator of degree below d (A coefficient sequence is eventually linearly recurrent if and only if its formal generating function is rational).

[L2]

The fraction field of K[x] is the rational function field K(x)={P/Q:P,QK[x], Q0} (For a field F, F(t)=Frac(F[t]) is its rational function field; in particular R(t)=Frac(R[t])).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Applying [L1] to the positive half gives F+=P/Q with degP<d, and applying it to the reversed negative half gives rationality of F.

givenL1
2.1

In the vector space of all formal sums nZanxn, multiplication by the polynomial Q is coefficientwise finite. The recurrence says QnZf(n)xn=0, so linearity gives Q(x)n1f(n)xn=Q(x)F+(x)=P(x).

givenstep 1.1algebra
2.2

The lowest nonzero coefficient of P/Q equals the lowest nonzero coefficient of P, because Q(0)=1; hence the positive minimum is r=min{j:βj0} and f(r)=βr.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Substitute x1 for x in step 2.1 and interpret both quotients in [L2]; this gives F+(x)=F(x1) in K(x), not as an equality of formal power series.

step 2.1L2algebra
4.1

Rewriting P(x1)/Q(x1) as cd1xdP(x1)/(1+cd1cd1x++cd1xd) shows that its first nonzero term has degree s=ddegP and coefficient cd1βds, proving the negative-side clauses.

step 3.1algebra
5.1

Apply the main identity to replace F+(x1) by F(x); coefficient comparison then shows that F+(x)=±xrsF+(x1) is equivalent to f(n)=f(n+rs) for every integer n.

step 3.1step 2.2step 4.1algebra
6.1

If P=0, then F+=0, so f(n)=0 for n0; solving the recurrence backwards using cd0 gives f(n)=0 for all nZ, and the main identity remains valid.

step 1.1given

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 29 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources