How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a bi-infinite linear recurrence over , the two half-series satisfy in
Statement
Let be a field, let , and let satisfy
where . Put
Both series are rational, and in the rational function field ,
More precisely, write with , , and . If
then and , while and . Finally,
holds exactly when for every . If , the recurrence and force , so the main identity holds and the minima are intentionally left undefined.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and a bi-infinite order- recurrence with nonzero trailing coefficient.
An eventual recurrence has a rational generating function, and a recurrence from zero with reciprocal denominator gives a numerator of degree below (A coefficient sequence is eventually linearly recurrent if and only if its formal generating function is rational).
The fraction field of is the rational function field (For a field , is its rational function field; in particular ).
Proof
Applying [L1] to the positive half gives with , and applying it to the reversed negative half gives rationality of .
In the vector space of all formal sums , multiplication by the polynomial is coefficientwise finite. The recurrence says , so linearity gives .
The lowest nonzero coefficient of equals the lowest nonzero coefficient of , because ; hence the positive minimum is and .
Substitute for in step 2.1 and interpret both quotients in [L2]; this gives in , not as an equality of formal power series.
Rewriting as shows that its first nonzero term has degree and coefficient , proving the negative-side clauses.
Apply the main identity to replace by ; coefficient comparison then shows that is equivalent to for every integer .
If , then , so for ; solving the recurrence backwards using gives for all , and the main identity remains valid.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 29 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. P. Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics, vol. 1, 2nd ed., Proposition 4.2.3 and Corollary 4.2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)