Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Over a named splitting field in characteristic zero, repeated characteristic roots give polynomial-times-exponential closed forms

Statement

Let K be a field of characteristic zero, let (an)n≥0 satisfy an order-d recurrence from zero, and let E/K be a splitting field of its characteristic polynomial. If

χ(t)=∏i=1s(t−λi)mi

in E[t], with distinct roots λi, then there are unique polynomials pi∈E[z] with deg⁡pi<mi such that

an=∑i=1spi(n)λin(n≥0).

Conversely, every sequence of this form satisfies the recurrence whose characteristic polynomial is the displayed product. Equality is in E, and no identification with R or C is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A characteristic-zero field K, a sequence satisfying a recurrence from zero, a named splitting field E/K, and the displayed factorisation of its characteristic polynomial.

[L1]

A recurrence from zero has a proper rational generating function with its reciprocal denominator (A coefficient sequence is eventually linearly recurrent if and only if its formal generating function is rational).

[L2]

The factorisation χ(t)=∏i(t−λi)mi corresponds to Q(x)=∏i(1−λix)mi (Reciprocal-root convention: χ(t)=∏i(t−λi)mi corresponds to Q(x)=∏i(1−λix)mi).

[L3]

A proper fraction with that split denominator has a unique expansion ∑i,jbij(1−λix)−j (A proper rational function with split denominator has a unique repeated-pole partial-fraction expansion).

[L4]

Formally, [xn](1−λx)−j=(n+j−1j−1)λn (Repeated poles expand formally as (1−λx)−j=∑n≥0(n+j−1j−1)λnxn).

[L5]

A splitting field is generated by the roots over the base field, and repeated factors record their multiplicities (Polynomials that split and splitting fields of a polynomial or a family of polynomials).

[L6]

Characteristic zero means that no positive natural multiple of the field identity is zero (The characteristic of a ring: the least n≥1 with n⋅1R=0 when one exists, and 0 otherwise).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2L5

By [L1] the generating function is P/Q with P=0 or deg⁡P<d, and [L2] identifies Q with the split product ∏i(1−λix)mi in E[x].

1.2L6L7algebra

By [L6], every positive factorial is nonzero and hence invertible in E. For 1≤j≤m put qj(z)=((j−1)!)−1(z+1)(z+2)⋯(z+j−1)∈E[z], the product being empty for j=1, so q1=1. Each qj has degree j−1 and leading coefficient ((j−1)!)−1≠0, and for every natural n the identity (n+j−1j−1)(j−1)!=(n+j−1)j−1‾=(n+1)⋯(n+j−1) from [L7] gives qj(n)=(n+j−1j−1). The degrees 0,…,m−1 are distinct, so triangular elimination makes q1,…,qm a basis of the polynomials in E[z] of degree below m.

2.1step 1.2L1L2L4algebra

Conversely, expand each pi in the binomial-polynomial basis from step 1.2. Then [L4] shows that the generating function of pi(n)λin has denominator dividing (1−λix)mi; summing gives a rational function with denominator dividing Q, so [L1] gives the recurrence with characteristic polynomial dividing the displayed product. Multiplying by any missing factors gives the displayed order-d recurrence itself.

2.2step 1.1L3L4

Apply [L3] and then [L4] to obtain an=∑i=1s∑j=1mibij(n+j−1j−1)λin.

3.1step 2.2step 1.2L3

Step 1.2 rewrites each coefficient (n+j−1j−1) as qj(n), so grouping the terms of step 2.2 with the same i gives an=∑ipi(n)λin with pi=∑j=1mibijqj, a polynomial in E[z] of degree below mi. Uniqueness follows from the uniqueness in [L3], the basis property in step 1.2, and coefficient extensionality.

4.1step 3.1step 2.1L2∎

Steps 3.1 and 2.1 prove both directions, including repeated roots and the case of one root. The condition cd≠0 in the recurrence excludes zero among the λi.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources