How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A bundle connection is local and restricts to open sets
Statement
For a connection on , if two sections agree near , their covariant derivatives at agree in every tangent direction. The derivative in direction depends only on . For every open , there is a unique connection on agreeing with the original on restricted global sections; restrictions to nested open sets compose. Boundary points are included.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth bundle , a connection , a point where relevant, and an open set .
Directional connection laws hold; the converse proof also constructs plateau cutoffs in interior and boundary charts (Connection laws in directional form).
The connection value is a smooth fibrewise linear map (Connection on a smooth vector bundle).
Proof
Suppose vanishes on a neighbourhood of . Take a smooth cutoff supported in with , using the construction in the proof of [F1]. Since , the Leibniz rule at any gives . Apply this to the difference of two sections. The direction depends only on its value by [F2]; no assertion that was needed in this vanishing argument.
For a local section on , take a cutoff supported in and equal to one on a neighbourhood of . Extend by zero outside to a global smooth section : outside its closed support it is identically zero, so the definitions paste smoothly. Define . Different extensions agree near , so step 1.1 proves independence. On , one fixed extension works at every point, making smooth. Local functions can be extended by the same cutoff; the global real-linearity and Leibniz laws then imply those laws on . Thus this is a connection.
Any other restriction connection is local by step 1.1 applied on , and agrees on the global extension in step 2.1; hence its value on at is forced. This proves uniqueness and, by applying uniqueness twice, composition of restrictions. The empty open set has a unique zero operator. Zero sections and rank-zero bundles give zero derivatives in steps 1.1 and 2.1; rank one and a zero-dimensional base require no modification. A single point is handled with a single cutoff, and the uniquely specified values assemble without a choice of cutoffs for all points.
Depends on
Used by
- Connection one form in a local frame Definition
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry, Lemma 5.1.1 and Corollary 5.1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)