How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If is closed under taking subsets then shatters every
Statement
Let be closed under taking subsets. Then every member is shattered by .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a downward-closed family and a set .
A set is shattered when every subset of it occurs as a trace (Shattering and the Vapnik–Chervonenkis dimension of a set family).
Proof
If , then by downward closure and . So every subset of is a trace of on .
Hence , and is shattered by .
Remarks
- This is the step that converts the structural output of shifting into the size bound of Sauer-Shelah.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. Babai and P. Frankl, Linear Algebra Methods in Combinatorics, §7.5 (standard reference, not scraped)