How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Applying down-shifts until none changes the family terminates, and the result is closed under taking subsets
Statement
Starting from a finite family and repeatedly applying effective down-shifts eventually stops. The final family is closed under taking subsets.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a finite family .
The weight is a natural number (The down-shift of a set family at a point ).
An effective shift strictly decreases the weight and preserves the number of sets (, and with equality only when ).
Proof
Every effective shift strictly decreases the natural number by [L1]. Therefore there cannot be an infinite sequence of effective shifts, so the process terminates.
Let be a family on which every down-shift is ineffective. If and , then the definition of an ineffective shift forces .
By repeatedly removing one element at a time and using step 1.2, every subset of every member of also lies in . So the terminal family is downward closed.
Remarks
- The proof spends no order on the points of beyond the ability to choose which shift to apply next; any effective shift decreases the same weight.
Depends on
- The down-shift $S_j$ of a set family at a point $j$
- $\lvert S_j(\mathcal{F})\rvert=\lvert\mathcal{F}\rvert$, and $w(S_j(\mathcal{F}))\le w(\mathcal{F})$ with equality only when $S_j(\mathcal{F})=\mathcal{F}$
- A subset of a finite set is finite, with $\lvert B\rvert \le \lvert A\rvert$, and equality holds if and only if $B = A$
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- Order on the natural numbers
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. Babai and P. Frankl, Linear Algebra Methods in Combinatorics, §7.5 (standard reference, not scraped)